In a significant development in the ongoing Awujale succession saga, Otunba Wasiu Olasunkanmi Ayinde Adesanya Marshall has formally withdrawn his suit against the Ogun State Government, Ijebu Ode Local Government, and other respondents, including the Awujale Interregnum Administrative Council and the Fusengbuwa Ruling House.
The notice of discontinuance was filed on 22 December 2025 at the High Court of Ogun State, Ijebu-Ode Judicial Division, where Marshall had earlier challenged the processes surrounding the selection of the next Awujale of Ijebuland.
According to the court documents, the discontinuance follows correspondences from the 2nd Respondent, which were subsequently withdrawn, prompting the applicant to halt further legal proceedings. The filing requested the court to record the discontinuance and make any orders it deems fit.
Marshall’s legal team, led by Dr. Wahab Shittu SAN and supported by lawyers including Abidakun Olushola Felix, Don Akaegbu, Oluyemi Osalusi, Ayokunmi Adegbemi, and others, formally signed the notice, marking the end of the litigation.
The respondents named in the suit include:
-
Executive Governor of Ogun State, Prince Dapo Abiodun
-
Executive Chairman, Ijebu Ode Local Government
-
Commissioner for Local Government & Chieftaincy Affairs
-
Attorney General & Commissioner for Justice, Ogun State
-
Secretary, Ijebu Ode Local Government
-
Chairman, Awujale Interregnum Administrative Council
-
Chairman, Fusengbuwa Ruling House, Otunba Lateef Owoyemi
Barrister Fassy Yusuf, who represented observers of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House during the proceedings, commented that while the discontinuance closes the suit filed on 14 December, it does not necessarily prevent the applicant from raising new issues in the future. He advised all parties to remain vigilant, noting that Marshall may still have plans related to the Awujale stool.
Legal analysts say the discontinuance signals a step back from prolonged litigation over the Awujale stool and clears the way for the succession process to proceed without legal impediments.
The case had previously attracted national attention due to contentions over the selection procedure, the alleged involvement of the Interregnum Council, and disputes over candidate eligibility. With the withdrawal, the matter is now expected to focus on customary and administrative resolution rather than court intervention.


Leave a comment